Today in class we discussed at length St. Augustine's interesting and eccepting view of other practices and ideas. I thought it would be interesting to speculate on what his take would be of an idea that came about long after his time, specifically evolution.
A very controversial issue for social, religious, and even political debate, evolution has been both accepted and rejected by different Christian groups. I would like to investigate, using his own words and opinions expressed in "On Christian Teaching", St. Augustine's take on theist evolutionism. Theistic evolutionism is, at its core, the belief that evolution is God's tool for creating the world. This viewpoint has been rejected by many Christian denominations who favor Creationism or Intelligent Design, but has also been accepted by such figures and bodies as Pope John Paul II and the Catholic Church.
First, I think Augustine's opinion on science leaves room for theistic evolutionism. On page 47 he describes two kinds of learning, human instituted and divinely instituted. I would argue that theistic evolutionism could be viewed as divinely instituted because it is an attempt to understand and appreciate God's creation. Furthermore, thestic evolution doesn't wander into the dangerous territory that Augustine warns about on page 54, that is, it doesn't become an obstacle to more important things, because the focus is on creation, and God's method for bringing the immense biodiversity of our world about. Finally, the approach to studying evolution (including theistic evolution) would be considered science by Augustine, especially considering his differentiation between science and superstitition on page 56 where he contrasts orally ingesting some types of plants to wearing them around your neck. The systematic approach used in evolutionary biology is consistent with the logic-based reason that Augustine defends here.
I think theistic evolution would bypass (at least to Augustine) the main hurdle that it has faced from the modern Christian groups, biblical reference to creation. My reasoning for this assertion is as follows. First, on pages 75 and 76, Augustine says that anything not pertaining to good morals or true faith can be taken as figurative. He goes on to describe that this "true faith" can be accounted for as long as one's conscience sees progress being made towards understanding the love of God. I would argue that theistic evolution could and does legitimately pursue this goal, by increasing our understanding of the incredible care and masterful power God would need to have to create such an incredibly complex living world. Second, but related, this idea is further supported within the context of Augustine's statements on page 79, where he describes acts being evaluated within their cultural context. I would argue that he would acept the act of believing and supporting theistic evolution ESPECIALLY considering the overwhelming body of evidence and broad support for evolution. Finally, because belief in theistic evolution would not comprimise the the major foundations and goals of a Christian life, it would be a valid biblical interpretation considering Augustine's acceptance of such interpretations on page 87.
For these reasons I believe that St. Augustine would accept this interpretation that has been considered so heretic by many modern Christian groups.